A division of 

The following exchange took place between a classic predator apologist and Jon K. Uhler, LPC, on Twitter. This thread is useful for understanding the degree of deception of both the Predator Apologist (who initially always present as objective and interested in learning from those with clinical backgrounds dealing with predators). The predator apologist eventually is joined by a uniquely sexually deviant AGP/MAP, who tenaciously hides his online identity, has multiple fake Twitter accounts (inevitably to gain access to minors), who has become so fixated on Jon K. Uhler, LPC, so as to mimic him on Twitter. As you read the following, notice how Ivy (turns out likely to be a deviant male, given the hiding of identity, and the lack of revulsion once "Ron" is unmasked for being a deviant "Minor Attracted Person" [a pedophile]), sounds so reasonable at first. Where as any normal adult woman would be repulsed and angered at being deceived by a perp, Ivy reveals the opposite. Also, notice the extent to which "Ron" goes to try to create a false narrative about Jon, only to be unmasked, as a creep who has spent countless hours on Jon's websites, and has strategically collected screen shots of young girls. Also, notice how "Ron" is never phased by being unmasked as a deviant deceiver, and notice the lack of visceral reaction on the part of Ivy toward "Ron." This is a classic example of how "birds of a feather" (Ivy and "Ron"), flock together.

This is provided for educational purposes, so you can see the classic line of reasoning and debate tactics porn-fueled perpetrators and their apologists use to counter any professional who begins to highlight the dangers of porn, unmask the deviance of pedophiles, and unravel the spin these deviants attempt to put forward re. "non-offending" pedophiles. Ads you read the exchange, notice the degree of persistence these porn-fueled identity-hiding deviants evidence, notice their attempts to sound knowledgable (without any clinical background), and notice how quickly they will duck and dodge the issues of the harm of porn, and their own porn consumption.