In the following, you will find a compilation of "Tweets" and "Posts" by Church Protect's Founder, Jon K. Uhler, MS, LPC @JonKUhlerLPC &
Facebook/JonUhler ). These represent a small portion of what he addresses each month, as he focuses on a wide variety of topics dealing with both Predators and Survivors.
As Church Protect's mission is to educate churches and other organizations on the true nature of the most sophisticated of Predators (those who specifically select churches and people of faith as their "primary targets of opportunity"), the information contained in these bite-sized nuggets of truth are designed to equip the reader to better understand the inner world and mindset of the Sophisticated Sexual Predator, in order to equip good people to better protect children and other vulnerable individuals from such Predators.
*** Updated ***
The following is currently best viewed
on either a tablet or a pc
As we all experience the impact of the Corona Virus, finding ourselves at home even more than during the Holidays, and kids off from school for an extended period of time, it is far too easy for parents to permit their children on their phones and computers for longer periods of time than what would be normal. However, what most parents don't realize is how much Child Predators are active during such times, and work overtime to take advantage of such an opportunity, turning "social distancing" into the perfect opportunity to "reach out and touch someone"... especially children.
Predators are at the top of their game when kids are permitted online with little meaningful protections and supervision. They hunt best when parents are unaware of the methods Predators employ to strategically hunt, select, close in on, and groom certain kids. Predators hunt best when parents are distracted, and when parents are lulled into assuming that calm waters means that everything is fine. And, given that Predators are unusually patient, persistent, and strategic in their methods of hunting, they are most active and effective when they know that a parent's resolve toward remaining vigilant of their child's online activities begins to wane.
Much like sharks which focus on certain sections of coastline, child predators troll those areas of the internet where kids are known to frequent.
The most sophisticated of Predators are the most proficient in their use of deception, and have an unusual ability to make themselves appear as harmless and safe, lulling both children and parents into believing that the child's new online "friend" is simply harmless, and even fun-loving. But, few parents understand the methodical and strategic grooming process employed by Predators, as they artfully wait for the right opportunity to avail itself... when parents aren't around... when children are permitted to spend extended time online with the unusually attentive "friends" they've made while playing certain online games, on certain social media sites, or in certain chatroom.
Little by little, the sense of caution is diminishes as the predator is unusually patient and tactical, as he knows time is on his side. He must take the necessary time to prime the "target of opportunity", to help override the child's intuition, to where they become unable to distinguish friend from foe, the harmless from the predatorial.
That is how Predators are able to introduce themselves, to get close enough to unsuspecting children to gain their confidence, to gather sufficient information from the children, and to create the sort of emotional bond with the intended victim that enables a dangerous attachment to be established... by which a predator can begin emotionally separating a child from his/her parents. They are able to masquerade so skillfully that both the child and parent can lose the ability to discern between a playful online greeting from a nefarious one.
Though things have changed a bit in terms of their methods... given the mandate for social distancing... that simply means they have made hunting on the internet all that more of a priority during this brief interlude. Predators have found this "down time" to gear up for when their direct-contact can resume. So, the same groups of pedophiles are using social distancing as a means of improving their game toward establishing contact with children and "softening the targets" by promoting those activities that will afford them direct contact once things get back to normal. Through these target marketing efforts, they will have already "gotten a foot in the door"... made headway in the child's mind, introduced sexually provocative topics and images through seemingly "innocent" cartoons and animation, engaged them through anthropomorphic online games (where the child can take on an animal personality, lowered their inhibitions, peeked their curiosity, lured the child with emotional appeals, and relationally manipulated the child to where he/she is eager to go see the kinds of "fun adults" with whom they were interacting. The following categories have become some of the more useful kinds of "fun and games" for predators to utilize in their grooming: Drag (introducing the sexual theme of porn-influenced deviance) , anime (which introduces sexual themes and pictures), and Furries (introducing zoophilia/bestiality themes), which can serve to help introduce Trans (sex change) and pansexuality (no sexual limits in terms of sexual behavior). And, as seen in the following screen shots, there is a clear and intentional effort to market to younger and younger kids.
The following have become widely utilized by Sexual Predators as a means of grooming kids, as they know the power of marketing and rebranding deviance. Are all adults within alternative life styles predators? Of course not. That would be like saying that anything that comes close to the shore at the beach must be a Predator. But, what I am saying is that for those who haven't carefully studied the minds, methods, motives, characteristics and profiles of the sexual predators, it places them at a significant disadvantage in terms of the ability to discern whether it is safe to venture into those waters. Parents can't be expected to know al the warning signs of dangerous waters, so that is where the experts come in... those who can give the all clear or raise the Red Flag warning, warning parents to keep their kids out of the water. The question is, who is raising the warnings vs. who is trying to suggest that there is nothing to fear by playing in those waters, so they can simply ignore the phobic guy with the signs?
However, the silence by those "Communities" with respect to condemning and calling for the aggressive prosecution of those predators within their ranks is not only appalling, but very telling. So, decry as they might, claiming 'Phobia" against even the suggestion that there are predators who purposely embed themselves within those movements in order to easy access to vulnerable kids. However, 11+ years working with thousands of incarcerated sex offenders, reviewing their criminal files, hearing from them how grooming is accomplished, puts to rest such lame attempts at distracting from the reality that Predators use the the following to target and groom kids, as they know that many kids, who are either naive and are sitting ducks, or who've already been sexually groomed and/or exploited, gravitate to the following, and therefore are easy prey for sophisticated predators who are waiting in those waters.
From my 11+ yrs of working "up close and personal" with thousands of Predators behind bars... serving within a number of unique clinical settings, which afforded unlimited access to the full continuum of sex offenders in ways that the vast majority of academic researchers could only dream of... the one thing I learned is just how much I did not know about sexual predators... prior to working with them in prison.
Though I thought I understood about sexual predators from my readings in academic literature... through my graduate school course work, the lectures given by our tenured professors, and the assigned graduate school text book readings which all spent time on the subject of the criminal mind and sexual offenders... it was not until actually working with them in prison that I began to see what was NOT covered in those textbooks, and how much was NOT revealed, or perhaps known, in the academic literature.
And, even more important, I came to recognize just how flawed and contrived the research currently being pushed, which supposedly explains why Pedophiles offend, how there is such a thing as a MAP ("Minor Attracted Person"... AKA men who lust after kids)... men who are supposedly different from pedophiles in terms of Risk posed to kids, how there is such a thing as a "non-offending" pedophile, and how lusting after children comes from either developmental dynamics, past abuse, or brain abnormalities.
I discovered how much of what is covered in graduate textbooks and in the academic literature about pedophiles is either naively or knowingly being used to push some very dangerous myths... and, in some cases, knowingly contrived and deceptively-packaged agenda-driven pro-pedophile propaganda, which has resulted in an increased degree of risk to children.
Truth be told, the majority of research on pedophiles (whether they be labeled as such or not, whether they've been busted yet or not) has relied heavily upon time-limited structured interviews (in an office or institutional setting), which takes "at face value" the words (self-reports) of men who have either sexually harmed and exploited children, or have admitted wanting to do so... which considers those words to be truthful, reliable, and valid... which is then tabulated, extrapolated, and summarized into "findings"... which is then reviewed and approved by those who feel comfortable with viewing such a method as being able to produce reliable and valid results... which confers upon the researcher the title of "academic expert."
However, when pressed about his methodology, the researcher is hard pressed to ensure that what he was told by the offender was not:
what the offender had planned to say,
strategized by the offender toward the end of manipulating the interviewer toward a desired outcome,
provided to confirm what the researcher was already inclined to believe,
used as a means of crafting a false narrative and doing the pedophile's bidding pushing a myth or generating talking points,
used to get the false information into the "academic literature"... which will be peer reviewed and approved as "ground breaking findings",
strategically used to influence the beliefs of future clinicians, public opinion, public policy, Sex Offender Risk Assessments, judicial opinions and decisions... which can result in flawed sex offender risk assessments... which then can be used in reframing the risk posed by some of the most dangerous of pedophiles... which can result in High Risk child offenders being inaccurately deemed Low Risk... providing the justification for early release.
As an expert in analyzing the power of impression management in research interviews, university professor, law school faculty, and Sociologist, Dr. Robert C. Sorensen, Ph.D., in his time-tested article in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Interviewing Prison Inmates, expert in research interviews, he highlighted the challenges in interviewing anyone "doing time", as there are inherent challenges with objectively determining the veracity of the inmate's self-report.
Though years have past since Dr. Sorensen authored his article, the truths have remained just as true today as they existed then, as the dynamics will always be the same. His words are simply axiomatic. Yet, how much of what has come to be believed about pedophiles is the result of their self-report? As they are the world's greatest deceivers (that is how the vast majority of sophisticated predators get away with offending as long as they do), to take them at face value during a structured interview with respect to their disclosure of reasons why they did what they did, and what contributed to their offending, is questionable at best.
Does that mean that interviews with inmates in general are suspect? No, as there are a wide variety of categories of offenders, and there are various reasons for research interviews. However, for those of us who've researched sex offenders in any depth, and for those of us Certified to administer the PCL-R, it is clear that those who've harmed children had a more extensive history of elaborate deception than any other category of criminal mind.
There is no better illustration of the degree of deception than understanding who the target market is for the book, Pass the PCL-R.
Given that the Hare Psychopathy Checklist is a specialized forensic test, which is administered by a professional who has been certified in the use of the instrument, used to assess degrees of psychopathy, just exactly who might be interested in reading up on how to practice manipulating the clinician administering the test? Since it is a test reserved for those who are not clearly a threat to those in decision-making capacities, it is not the highly impulsive or bloody psychopaths who are generally administered the test.
The test is, to a large extent, reserved for those with a history of violent sexual offenses, which would include most sexual offenses against children. That is why the PA Sexual Offender Assessment Board includes the PCL-R in their assessment process for the purpose of informing the Parole Board of their findings. Therefore, the vast majority of those who would be interested in reading the book would likely be those with child sex offenses. Which highlights the high percentage of sophisticated predators that exists within that category of sex offender.
A little context will help in setting the stage for how I came to see what so few academic researchers have had a chance to see... and why some of my key findings... which I have addressed extensively since retiring from the prison system... differ in important respects from what is currently held to be true about pedophiles by so many in the academic world.
And, understanding my background will help you see how I came to be able to speak authoritatively about the reality that it is porn that fuels the deviance within the minds of men who say they are "attracted" to children.
It is such darkened and deviant men and their Predator Apologists (some of these Apologists are equally as nefarious and pushing these deceptions as an insurance policy, some are simply dangerously misguided) who are pushing the following very dangerous and fictitious man-made psychological myths onto the public:
MAPs (Minor Attracted Persons) & "Non-offending" pedophiles... these fraudulent concepts have been pushed, toward influencing public sentiment, public perception, social media censorship (such as with Facebook and Twitter repeatedly banning my posts), public policy, legislation, legal opinions, and judicial decisions.
"Gender Fluidity"... the idea that one's gender is not determined based upon biology, but by how one feels or perceives their gender to be, as to whether they are a male, female, or "other". This man-made psychological myth forms the foundation for the Trans Deception, deviant sex education being pushed upon elementary school aged kids, and push to enable kids to begin sex change treatments via chemical/hormonal methods and/or surgeries. The sudden push within professional mental health, psychology, and psychiatry of what used to be a rarely seen disorder... that of "Gender Dysphoria" as a major diagnostic issue... which also coincides with the belief in gender fluidity, and forms the basis for the justification of directing and influencing a young person in the direction of sex change.
Maybe Dr. Cantor is unaware of the impact of porn on the brain? That would be strange for someone who prides himself on being able to see the finer details of brain imaging, now wouldn't it? But, we'll give him the benefit of the doubt, and offer the following few resources to help him see that porn addiction is real.
And, maybe I could suggest that he begin dealing with porn in the lives of the clients he is working with when he is treating their sexual addiction? He may be unaware that it is the height of to suggest that a client would be a sex addict without actively feeding that addiction with porn.
How do you know there is more to those pushing such myths than their interest in genuine science? Because, when you ask a very simple question, they simply elect NOT to respond. They will debate until a simple and very reasonable question is posed... a question which shouldn't take much thought, and should illicit an immediate, clear, and unequivocal reply. Sadly, Dr. Cantor and Dr. Blanchard simply have elected not to reply.
And, Dr. Cantor refused to answer the question a second time when it was posed directly to him during the above exchange. If a picture is worth a thousand words, the fact that he remains unwilling to condemn such clear sexual grooming speaks volumes, especially given his attempt to push such manufactured concepts such a "non-offending" pedophiles and "Minor Attraction."
If any clinician or researcher, who is willing to enter into debates about issues pertaining to normalizing the deviance of porn-influenced men, yet is unwilling to clearly answer with a bold denunciation against any such men who would get naked with kids, that is a huge concern... as they are not only Mandated Reporters, but also in a position of influence. Bright men, who demonstrate an ability to speak intensely about matters of male sexuality can and should be able to speak just as easily against men who would get naked with them. If they remain silent, then they simply are speaking volumes in terms of their ability to discern predatory behavior and their opinion of what is or is not harmlful and sexually
Such a refusal on the part of any man to avoid clearly denouncing any man who would get naked with children should cause us to reconsider the research he has conducted, as his methodologies and his "peer reviewers" may not be as objective as would be required to produce valid and reliable findings... especially if their research is being used to influence public opinion, public policy, risk assessments, forensic psychological evaluations parole determinations, and judicial decisions.
When addressing the dynamics of Predators, why is it crucial that a clinician be able to discern the difference between developmental issues and deviance? Because Predators know how to initially portray themselves as upstanding members of the community, in order to gain direct access to vulnerable youth. But, once they are finally discovered (usually due to their child porn use and distribution), they will attempt to portray themselves as victims of their own past abuse. And, they will attempt to assert that such unresolved trauma created a life-long "attraction" toward kids. That too is a grand lie, as genuine victims of past abuse become protective of kids, NOT sexually exploitive of them... and, they don't get into child porn. They may become addicted to adult porn, but never child porn. Why? Because they have a natural repulsion against anyone who would touch a child sexually, since that is what happened to them. And, those who were sexually abused as children will inevitably reveal symptoms along the way throughout the school years, they don't make their way into adulthood unscathed, well-adjusted, and well-socialized.
Thus, simply put, any man busted with child porn was not victimized himself. He's simply counting on the professional not knowing he is making it up.
How can you tell that is the case? Spend time doing sex offender treatment in prison, and you will clearly see the difference, as you will see the men who have adult victims have to restrain themselves from harming those who've harmed children. But, they will still use the term "baby rapers" to describe the pedophiles. And, that's why the pedophiles quickly learn that they can pass off the lies to the general public and to researchers, when they can't to the other inmates, as the inmates know about the pedophiles' consumption of child porn. That is simply a lie, and heard that floated countless times by the pedophiles in prison sex offender treatment groups. But, they know that flawed and/or deceptive research has helped pave the way for such a lie to be accepted. Thus, it has been time-tested powerful means of generating misplaced sympathies and getting a lighter punishment... or getting off all together, by being diverted to treatment instead of doing time in prison.
Additionally, is it crucial that a clinician be able to discern the difference between genuine victims and manipulative predators,are often unable to truly discern the extent to which they have been exploited, or are unable to directly cry out for help. As such, as Mandated Reporters, clinicians must be able to meaningfully discern the fraudulent attempts by Predators to appear as Survivors, and the actual signs and symptoms of sexual abuse, grooming, and exploitation.
As Mandated Reporters, clinicians must be able to meaningfully discern the fraudulent attempts by Predators to appear as Survivors, and the actual signs and symptoms of sexual abuse, grooming, and exploitation.
In the following video, listen to how many of the above clinical symptoms that Leoacia had, and how therapists along the way missed the clear symptoms of underlying abuse. Sadly, she encountered a predatory therapist who took advantage of her vulnerability, and influenced her toward "transitioning." That is something I am hearing on an increasing basis, as Survivors are starting to finally disclose the secrets they've been carrying. Lee has done a tremendous job doing a lot of the work necessary for healing, but only after she was used and abused by supposed professionals pushing the Trans Deception to manipulate her. Her story and her insights are worth listening to via her channel.
The DSM-IV was published in 1994, and first introduced the diagnosis of Gender Identity Disorders of Childhood. It was then revised in 2000 to Gender Identity Disorders, where it expands to include adolescents. Interestingly, the data shows an upward trend with that diagnosis after it is introduced as a billable diagnosis for teens. Notice anything after the diagnosis becomes billable in 1994?
After approximately 13 years, a new version of the DSM (5) is published in May 2013.
After approximately 13 years, a new version of the DSM (5) is published in May 2013. This is when the diagnosis of
Gender Dysphoria suddenly appears for the first time in a prominent way... out of nowhere really... and, therefore, it became a billable diagnosis.
Some would suggest that the correlation between a new billable diagnosis and a sudden upward shift is simply coincidental in terms of trends relating to Gender Treatment and surgeries starting in May, 2013. Notice anything after the diagnosis becomes billable?